Canada Bill C-12, formally known as the Strengthening Canada’s Immigration System and Borders Act, has introduced major changes to Canada’s immigration system and asylum system. The law affects refugee claimants, temporary residents, immigration documents, information sharing, and how certain refugee claims are screened before referral to the Immigration and Refugee Board.
For people seeking refugee protection in Canada, the most important changes involve new eligibility rules. Some claimants who would previously have had their case heard by the Refugee Protection Division may now be found ineligible and directed toward a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment instead.
Canada Bill C-12: What Is It?
Canada Bill C-12 is a federal law that amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and related security measures. It received royal assent on March 26, 2026, and introduced changes affecting refugee claims, immigration documents, domestic information sharing, and application processing.
The Canadian government describes Bill C-12 as legislation aimed at strengthening Canada’s immigration system and borders. Its stated purpose is to make the refugee system more efficient, close loopholes, support public safety, and give Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada broader tools to manage immigration documents and applications.
The law changes several parts of the Canadian immigration system. It affects refugee protection, temporary resident documents, electronic travel authorizations, study permits, work permits, information sharing between government partners, and the ability to cancel categories of immigration documents in certain public interest circumstances.
For asylum seekers, the most significant impact is that some refugee claims will no longer be referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board for a hearing. Instead, people affected by the new rules may have access to a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment, commonly called a PRRA, before they face removal from Canada.
Key Changes to Asylum Claims Under Bill C-12
Bill C-12 creates new eligibility requirements for refugee claims made on or after June 3, 2025. The two most important changes are the one-year asylum claim rule and the 14-day irregular entry rule.
Under the new law, a refugee claim may be found ineligible if the person makes the claim more than one year after their first entry into Canada after June 24, 2020. This applies even if the person left Canada and later returned.
The second rule applies to people who enter Canada between ports of entry along the Canada-United States land border. If they make a refugee claim more than 14 days after irregular entry, the claim will not be referred to the Refugee Protection Division.
These rules change the front-end screening of refugee claims. The issue is not necessarily whether the person faces risk in their home country. The issue becomes whether the claim can be referred to the Refugee Board at all.
For many refugee lawyers and civil society organizations, this is the central concern. A person may have a genuine fear of persecution, gender based violence, armed conflict, political violence, or serious harm, but may still be denied a full refugee hearing because of when and how they made their claim.
The One-Year Asylum Claim Rule and the 14-Day Irregular Entry Rule
The one-year asylum claim rule means that a person who first entered Canada after June 24, 2020 may be barred from referral to the Refugee Protection Division if they wait more than one year after that first entry to make a refugee claim.
This rule can affect temporary residents who entered Canada with visitor status, a study permit, a work permit, or another form of temporary resident status, and later developed a need for refugee protection. It can also affect people whose situation changed after arrival, including those affected by changing country conditions, sexual orientation or gender identity issues, family violence, political instability, or fear of return to their home country.
The 14-day irregular entry rule is separate. It applies to people who entered Canada between official ports of entry along the Canada-United States land border. If they do not make their refugee claim within 14 days, their claim may not be referred to the Refugee Board.
These rules are especially important because they affect access to the Refugee Protection Division, where claimants usually have an oral hearing and can testify before an independent decision-maker. If a claim is found ineligible, the person may instead be directed to a PRRA, which is generally a paper-based process.
Increased Use of Pre-Removal Risk Assessments and Faster Processing Rules
Bill C-12 is expected to increase the use of Pre-Removal Risk Assessments for people who are found ineligible to make a refugee claim under the new rules. A PRRA assesses whether a person would face persecution, torture, risk to life, or cruel and unusual treatment if removed from Canada.
A PRRA can be important, but it is not the same as a refugee hearing before the Immigration and Refugee Board. PRRA applications are usually decided on written materials, and oral hearings are not automatic. This means that strong evidence, detailed written submissions, country condition documents, and legal arguments become even more important.
Bill C-12 also supports a modernized asylum process. The government has stated that future regulatory changes will simplify online forms, reduce duplicate questions, refer only complete and schedule-ready claims to the Refugee Board, and remove inactive cases from the system.
The law also includes claim abandonment rules. If a claimant voluntarily returns to their country of alleged persecution before the Refugee Board decides the claim, the claim may be considered abandoned. This is important because travel back to the home country can already raise serious credibility and reavailment concerns in refugee law.
The government has also indicated that removal orders may become effective more quickly where a claim is withdrawn, which may accelerate voluntary departures and enforcement action.
Who Is Most Affected and How Bill C-12 Changes Refugee Claim Eligibility?
Bill C-12 most directly affects people who delay making refugee claims, people who entered Canada irregularly between ports of entry, and temporary residents whose fear of return arose after they first entered Canada. It may also affect vulnerable people who did not understand the asylum system or could not access legal help in time.
People most affected may include:
Temporary residents who waited more than one year after first entry to claim refugee protection.
People who entered irregularly from the United States and claimed after 14 days.
Refugee claimants who misunderstood the immigration process.
People affected by trauma, gender based violence, or coercive family situations.
People whose home country conditions changed after they entered Canada.
Individuals with limited access to legal counsel, interpretation, or community support.
Unaccompanied minors and vulnerable people who may need special procedural safeguards.
The following comparison explains the practical difference between the previous asylum process and the Bill C-12 framework:
Issue | Before Bill C-12 | After Bill C-12 |
|---|---|---|
Late refugee claim after first entry | Delay could affect credibility, but did not automatically block referral in many cases | Claims made more than one year after first entry after June 24, 2020 may be ineligible |
Irregular entry between ports of entry | Safe Third Country Agreement issues could apply, but timing depended on the facts | Claims after 14 days from irregular land border entry may be ineligible |
Refugee Board hearing | Many eligible claims were referred to the Refugee Protection Division | Some claims may not be referred to the Refugee Board |
Risk assessment | Refugee hearing often assessed risk through testimony and evidence | PRRA may become the main risk process for affected claimants |
Decision-maker | Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board | Immigration department decision-makers in PRRA cases |
Appeal and review | Refugee Appeal Division may be available in some cases, plus Federal Court judicial review | Negative PRRA decisions may generally proceed through Federal Court judicial review |
The key practical change is that eligibility screening becomes more important. Before the substance of the refugee claim is even heard, officers may decide whether the claim can be referred to the Refugee Board.
Does Bill C-12 Apply Retroactively?
Bill C-12 has retroactive effects because the one-year rule applies to first entries into Canada after June 24, 2020, even though the law received royal assent in 2026. This has raised serious concerns among refugee lawyers, public interest organizations, and civil liberties groups.
The concern is that people who entered Canada years ago may not have known that waiting to claim refugee protection could later prevent them from accessing a Refugee Protection Division hearing. This is particularly important for people whose fear developed over time, who were minors when they first entered Canada, or who were affected by trauma, family violence, sexual orientation, gender identity, or changing country conditions.
The government has stated that the new eligibility requirements apply to claims made on or after June 3, 2025. That means the timing of the claim, the date of first entry, and the manner of entry all need to be carefully reviewed.
For anyone who entered Canada after June 24, 2020 and is now considering a refugee claim, legal advice is urgent. The first question is not only whether the person has a well-founded fear of persecution. The first question may be whether the claim can be referred to the Refugee Board at all.
Criticism and Legal Concerns About Bill C-12
Bill C-12 has been criticized by a broad coalition of refugee lawyers, civil liberties organizations, migrant rights groups, and public interest organizations. Critics include groups such as the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Amnesty International Canada, the Canadian Council for Refugees, the Migrant Rights Network, the Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association, the HIV Legal Network, the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund, and other civil society organizations.
The main criticism is that Bill C-12 may reduce access to due process for refugee claimants by denying some people a full oral hearing before the Refugee Protection Division. Critics argue that PRRA is not an equal substitute for a refugee hearing, especially for vulnerable people who need to explain trauma, gender based violence, sexual orientation, political opinion, religious persecution, or other complex risk factors.
There are also concerns about government power to cancel categories of immigration documents and applications in the public interest. Bill C-12 gives the government tools to cancel, suspend, or vary immigration documents, including visas, electronic travel authorizations, work permits, and study permits, in certain circumstances involving fraud, administrative error, public health, public safety, or national security.
The Canadian Bar Association’s Immigration Law Section also raised concerns about accountability, transparency, broad ministerial discretion, and the protection of vulnerable claimants. One major concern is that vague language, including “public interest,” may create uncertainty unless it is clearly defined and subject to proper oversight.
There may also be future litigation. Some legal organizations have warned that Bill C-12 could lead to more judicial review applications in Federal Court, especially where claimants are denied access to the Refugee Protection Division and must rely on PRRA decisions instead.
What Happens if an Asylum Claim Is Found Ineligible?
If an asylum claim is found ineligible under Bill C-12, it will not be referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board for a Refugee Protection Division hearing. The claimant may still have access to a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment before being removed from Canada.
This does not mean the person has no legal options. However, the process changes significantly. Instead of preparing for a full refugee hearing, the person may need to prepare a detailed PRRA package with evidence explaining the risks they face in their home country.
The person may also need to consider other immigration or legal avenues, depending on the facts, including:
A PRRA application.
A request to defer removal.
A humanitarian and compassionate application.
A Temporary Resident Permit in limited cases.
Judicial review at the Federal Court.
A stay of removal if removal is imminent.
Submissions based on procedural fairness or vulnerability.
Timing matters. If removal is scheduled, legal remedies may need to be pursued quickly. PRRA deadlines, Federal Court deadlines, and removal timelines can be short.
Can You Still Apply for Refugee Protection After Bill C-12?
Yes, many people can still apply for refugee protection after Bill C-12. The law does not eliminate refugee claims in Canada. However, it creates new eligibility barriers for certain claimants based on timing and manner of entry.
A person may still be eligible if they make their claim within the applicable time limits and are not barred by another ineligibility ground under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. People who make claims at ports of entry, people who qualify for Safe Third Country Agreement exceptions, and people who make timely claims may still have access to the Refugee Board, depending on the facts.
The important point is that every case now requires careful eligibility analysis. Before filing a claim, a claimant should review:
Date of first entry into Canada.
Date of most recent entry.
Whether they entered at a port of entry or between ports of entry.
Whether they previously held temporary resident status.
Whether they made any prior refugee claim.
Whether they have family members in Canada.
Whether Safe Third Country Agreement rules apply.
Whether they are facing removal.
Whether PRRA is available.
Whether there are vulnerability factors, including age, trauma, disability, or inability to understand the process.
A strong refugee claim is no longer enough on its own. The claim must also pass eligibility screening.
How AKM Law Immigration Lawyer Can Help After Bill C-12
Bill C-12 makes refugee law more technical and more urgent. For many people, the most important legal issue will be whether their claim can be referred to the Refugee Protection Division or whether they are at risk of being diverted into the PRRA process.
At AKM Law, our immigration lawyers help refugee claimants, temporary residents, and people facing removal understand how Bill C-12 may affect their case. We review entry dates, immigration history, temporary resident status, immigration documents, previous applications, family circumstances, and any risk factors connected to the home country. We also assess whether the one-year rule, the 14-day irregular entry rule, the Safe Third Country Agreement, or another eligibility issue may apply.
Where a refugee claim is still available, we assist with preparing the claim, gathering evidence, drafting legal submissions, and preparing clients for the Refugee Protection Division process. Where a claim is found ineligible, we help assess PRRA options, deferral requests, humanitarian and compassionate grounds, and urgent Federal Court remedies, including judicial review and stay motions where appropriate.
Bill C-12 has changed Canada’s asylum system, but it has not removed the need for individualized legal analysis. If you are afraid to return to your home country, have delayed making a claim, entered Canada irregularly, or are unsure whether you are still eligible for refugee protection, seek legal advice before taking the next step.
)
 "Common Reasons for Temporary Resident Visa Refusals in Canada")
 "New Refugee Eligibility Requirements in Canada")
 "CBSA Told Me to Leave Canada: What Do I Do?")
